On Nov 11, 2026 20:05, Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Quoting [email protected] (2026-11-11 19:50:51) > > On Nov 11, 2026 16:32, Ian Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So my agenda here > [ not-funny taken-out-of-context remark stripped ] > > > is to limit the broad-scale use of LLMs in Debian to > > > situations where we have consensus, *as decided by the GR*. > > > > But not everyone agrees with your lecture of the GR proposition 5 that won. > > > > It has in it: > > " > > Debian continues to rely on the judgment and responsibility of its > > individual contributors. Project members are expected to exercise > > appropriate care > > " > > AND a consensus part. So which one is it? Some may argue on the direction > > of individual own judgment. > > You mean Debian is not consensus-driven - votes are just theater, and > we don't try to find any common ground?
I mean that their decision was driven by their own judgment and could be seen as not needing to gather a consensus. This thread shows it isn't the case as a lot of people are violently against what they did, but that doesn't change my point: they didn't just disobey the GR vote, and it does not deserve sanction. Thomas P.S: bad formating of this message probably because my phone mail client is shit. Suggestion for a better one are welcome.
