Hi Andrey, Andrey Rakhmatullin, au 2026-11-13 : > On Thu, Nov 12, 2026 at 07:27:34PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > Inference engines usage had strong repercutions in productivity, > > but also in human interactions. Some people are doing great by > > using inference, but some people just cannot do things if they > > know this is going to trigger an inference. > > [...] > > > If I understand the situation correctly, the best chance to get > > to a reasonable resolution would be to accomodate people's > > preferences on whether to trigger an inference upon NEW upload. > > Should this include inference done by DFSG team members when processing > one's package?
I think that whether DFSG team members help themselves with inference engines during their review is their concern, independently of the contributor's preference who submitted the package to NEW. My rationale is that that would be compliant with constitution paragraph 3.1.1, which stipulates they can take whatever technical decision on their work. I understand it seems paradoxical, perhaps it could even be deemed hypocritical if one extrapolates the logic, but I don't have much better suggestion to accommodate the most extreme positions on this topic. Does that help you find my standpoint clearer? Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse my verbosity `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
