Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would this be enough for LyX? I think so. > > ----- Forwarded message from Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > > To: lyx@via.ecp.fr > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: copyright problem > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) > Date: 11 Oct 1998 19:17:04 +0200 > > [...] > I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to > compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx > with XForms. > [...] > ----- End forwarded message -----
I don't see how it follows. "we have implicitly allowed all users to link LyX with XForms" does not imply "we have implicitly allowed (re)distribution of the resulting LyX binaries", which I guess is the issue at hand. - Hari -- Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ [EMAIL PROTECTED] "When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom "Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash
