The main difference is that LyX is THEIR code. The problem w/ KDE is not so much its own code, rather it links other peoples GPL app w/QT and KDE to make Kapp. This is the brunt of the legal issue. The authors of app where not asked if it was ok to link w/QT, nor was the license modified to reflect this.
On 11-Oct-98 Gergely Madarasz wrote: > On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Michael Meskes wrote: > >> Would this be enough for LyX? I think so. >> >> >> [...] >> I agree that by using XForms in development, and XForms *is* needed to >> compile and run LyX, we have implicitly allowd all users to link Lyx >> with XForms. >> [...] > > I don't think so. It is not enough for KDE, why should it be enough for > LyX ? > > Greg > > -- > Madarasz Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry. > Egy pingvinre gyakorlatilag lehetetlen haragosan nezni. > HuLUG: http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/ > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 11-Oct-98 Time: 22:46:46 This message was sent by XFMail ----------------------------------
