On Mon, Jul 06, 1998 at 06:39:06PM -0400, Adam P. Harris wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Maybe we can adopt some ideas from the docreg format (Adam, what about > > "Date" instead "Update" and other renamings?). > > Yes, consistency is good. I thought 'update' wasn't a real element > however??
Well, I like to know what "Subjects" have changed recently. It has nothing to do with the final product DDH. > Here's the field name changes I suggest, if you want consistency: > > Section -> Subject > Heading -> Title > Update -> *drop on final version* Yes. Also "Update" -> "Date" for development version. Nice to see you agree. I already proposed that in ddh-design.sgml (on cvs since a few minutes, so I think you'll like it. I didn't change the actual files yet (to avoid changing test program), but big deal... s/Section:/Subject:/... Oh, btw: We will generate the final version anyway via makefile from the multiple files (debian.ddh, user.ddh, ...) so it is not a problem at all to filter out "Date" information. Marcus -- "Rhubarb is no Egyptian god." Debian GNU/Linux finger brinkmd@ Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.org master.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] for public PGP Key http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
