On Mon, Jul 06, 1998 at 07:54:00PM +0100, Marco Budde wrote:
> Am 01.07.98 schrieb apharris # burrito.onshore.com ...

> APH>              * Identifier
> 
> Ok, but we should use relative paths to the position of .docreg.

I don't think so. This is surprising and assumes that every .docreg file is
in a different location. I know that you want to do that, but I don't know
of any technical advantage. Could you provide me with a list?
 
> APH>              * Type
> 
> We should remove that. We#ve stored this information already in Subject.

This is important orthogonal information, exactly what you wanted twomonths
ago when you requested the availability of howtos in  a howto section. With
the "Type" field, we can map "Type: howto" to an additional "Subject:
wherever/howto" element without loosing consistency.
 
> APH>           Title                  80
> 
> Too big. The title should fit in one line of a WWW browser or a screen. I  
> would suggest <= 60.

We shouldn't think of represantation to early. Titles in WWW browsers can be
abbreviated, and I always use a 100x37 screen, so 90 characters title are
okay for me. Other read from a braille terminal with 20 chars, big deal. We
should stay on the safe side.
 
> APH>           Subject                        80      (multiple elements 
> combined)
> 
> Markus, how long are the longest entries of DDH? We should support at  
> least tree entries in this line.

I suggest 160.
 
> APH>           Description            1024
> 
> I#m using that at the moment in dhelp. I would say that this is to much.  
> This could fill one page or screen. 512 are enough.

I think we should be on the safe side again. Nobody is forced to use all
1024 characters.
 
> APH>           Language               2
> 
> Ok.

Maybe 5 for future extension?
 
> APH>           Creator                        200     (multiple elements 
> combined)
> APH>           Contributor            200     (multiple elements combined)
> APH>           Publisher              200     (multiple elements combined)
> 
> <= 100 should be enough.

I don't think so. Three authors of a document (see apt or doc-base), with
full name and email adress will not fit in 100 characters.
 
> APH>           Date                   80
> 
> ? 18-28-1998, I cound 10 characters.

Did you look at the iso standard?
 

What about font-encoding field? Is this covered by MIME types (i think so).

Marcus

-- 
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god."        Debian GNU/Linux        finger brinkmd@ 
Marcus Brinkmann                   http://www.debian.org    master.debian.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                        for public  PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/       PGP Key ID 36E7CD09


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to