On Wednesday, April 3, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:08:09PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> Any opinion? > > PS: I like debiandoc-sgml for this type of document for continuity and > ease of management but no way to include graphics at this moment :( Debiandoc was a great innovation when Ardo (& others) put it together.. But I would STRONGLY advise against starting a new doc project based on debiandoc. In a nutshell, debiandoc-sgml doesn't (IMO) possess sufficient complexity to represent the kind of info you're talking about. Furthermore, the docbook --> debiandoc conversion can easily be done, but the reverse (one to many) would create many headaches. If my $0.02 mean anything, I'd suggest you convert the original docs to docbook-xml. It'll save much effort in the long run. Cheers, Mark _____________________________________ Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian SGML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/> GPG fp: 50DF A22D 5119 3485 E9E4 89B2 BCBC B2C8 2BE2 FE81 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
