nigel barker wrote: > Looking at the release info, I am wondering about a couple of things: > > "low-fat clients" sounds crappy. I know this has been discussed > before, and I'm sorry. I'm pretty sure the term should be "thick > client", but I know a lot of you guys think that's wrong, in which > case you could use "semi-thick client" or stick to the old "diskless > workstation", which actually conveys more meaning I think. >
i use diskless workstation, thin client, and workstation. Since all this talk about what machine is fatter then the other is just vauge and confusing. Ronny -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
