2013/7/5 Bastien ROUCARIES <[email protected]> > > Le 5 juil. 2013 11:58, "Andreas Tille" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > [Moved from debian-devel to debian-edu list - IMHO it belongs way more > > there. The history of this thread started here > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/07/msg00108.html > > ] > > > > Hi José, > > > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:12:41AM +0200, José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez > wrote: > > > 2013/7/5 Andreas Tille <[email protected]> > > > > Thanks for bringing Debian Science up - otherwise I would have done > > > > this. Luis, Debian Science repositories (SVN or Git as you prefer) > are > > > > writable for any DD so you can commit straight to it. The package is > > > > also mentioned in Debian Science task electronics - so it perfectly > fits > > > > here. I'd strongly recommend using Debian Science Vcs for packaging > > > > because your work will show up on the Blends sentinel even before it > is > > > > uploaded. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andreas, I don't see it clear: > > > - For me qucs is education related more than science, so, I'd consider > it > > > in debian-edu more than in debian-science > > I use daily for my academic research. Edu or science fit. > > > Well, there are a lot of packages that fit perfectly in both and it > > makes no sense to "fight" for one or the other. Regarding the Blends > > tasks it is very simple: We mention the package in both and are done. > > > > If you need to decide for a VCS to maintain your packaging I would also > > not mind at all if you would do it in Debian Edu area - the only problem > > is that Debian Edu has not (yet - I know this is work in progress) > > established a kulture to maintain educational relevant packages inside a > > common VCS. In other Blends this as proven to be a *very* helpful > > thing. I just would like you to step back from a two-men-qucs packaging > > team - we just have a working infrastructure in Debian Science that can > > perfectly hold the qucs packaging and if Debian Edu might have this at > > one day and you feel better in working there it's perfectly fine to > > move. > > > > > - I've been qucs maintainer for 8 years, and filled the needed itp to > have > > > it again in the archive after a qt4 version looks to be working. > > > > That's great. > > Great > > > > > > - I don't like at all Adms in qucs, its compilation in most Debian > > > platforms is not very clear, and it looks more like a patch than a > program > > It is an external program commited as a convenience library. We could use > the external program by using configure flags in order to get verilgo a. > > I need verilog a and I will do the homework. > > Ok, let's go then. You said in a previous email that you've already uploaded adms to mentors. I've checked it has been removed, maybe for the lack of a sponsor. Could you upload it again, so I could check it and sponsor it?
Regards.
