Hi, I have a legal problem with adms.
Will post on legal On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:09 PM, José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 2013/7/5 Bastien ROUCARIES <[email protected]> >> >> >> Le 5 juil. 2013 11:58, "Andreas Tille" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> >> > >> > [Moved from debian-devel to debian-edu list - IMHO it belongs way more >> > there. The history of this thread started here >> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/07/msg00108.html >> > ] >> > >> > Hi José, >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:12:41AM +0200, José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez >> > wrote: >> > > 2013/7/5 Andreas Tille <[email protected]> >> > > > Thanks for bringing Debian Science up - otherwise I would have done >> > > > this. Luis, Debian Science repositories (SVN or Git as you prefer) >> > > > are >> > > > writable for any DD so you can commit straight to it. The package >> > > > is >> > > > also mentioned in Debian Science task electronics - so it perfectly >> > > > fits >> > > > here. I'd strongly recommend using Debian Science Vcs for packaging >> > > > because your work will show up on the Blends sentinel even before it >> > > > is >> > > > uploaded. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Andreas, I don't see it clear: >> > > - For me qucs is education related more than science, so, I'd consider >> > > it >> > > in debian-edu more than in debian-science >> >> I use daily for my academic research. Edu or science fit. >> >> >> > Well, there are a lot of packages that fit perfectly in both and it >> > makes no sense to "fight" for one or the other. Regarding the Blends >> > tasks it is very simple: We mention the package in both and are done. >> > >> > If you need to decide for a VCS to maintain your packaging I would also >> > not mind at all if you would do it in Debian Edu area - the only problem >> > is that Debian Edu has not (yet - I know this is work in progress) >> > established a kulture to maintain educational relevant packages inside a >> > common VCS. In other Blends this as proven to be a *very* helpful >> > thing. I just would like you to step back from a two-men-qucs packaging >> > team - we just have a working infrastructure in Debian Science that can >> > perfectly hold the qucs packaging and if Debian Edu might have this at >> > one day and you feel better in working there it's perfectly fine to >> > move. >> > >> > > - I've been qucs maintainer for 8 years, and filled the needed itp to >> > > have >> > > it again in the archive after a qt4 version looks to be working. >> > >> > That's great. >> >> Great >> >> >> > >> > > - I don't like at all Adms in qucs, its compilation in most Debian >> > > platforms is not very clear, and it looks more like a patch than a >> > > program >> >> It is an external program commited as a convenience library. We could use >> the external program by using configure flags in order to get verilgo a. >> >> I need verilog a and I will do the homework. >> >> > > Ok, let's go then. You said in a previous email that you've already uploaded > adms to mentors. I've checked it has been removed, maybe for the lack of a > sponsor. Could you upload it again, so I could check it and sponsor it? > > Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAYGy+=GTq=svoJBgDH8hth1=+b-nmfwyizxqykezdo...@mail.gmail.com
