2009/11/3 Damyan Ivanov <[email protected]>: > A wishlist bug on udev, the kernel or even laptop-mode-tools.
As far as I can see, the maintainer policy for udev and kernel in Debian will never let this through; I'm not even going to try. laptop-mode-tools is not [laptop-]universal just as eeepc-acpi-scripts, it only has a higher popcon, so it is not a solution either [1]. > I agree with SynrG that eeepc-acpi-scripts shall be trimmed of > anything that is not specific to the Eee (and even the Eee-specific > stuff could find its place in other packages). Your patch seems like > a step in the opposite direction. I agree. Unfortunately, I don't think there's a chance to get a patch rejected upstream in the debian kernel, or an additional rule in udev - the places I think it belongs. If you think that it's not acceptable as a stop-gap solution in eeepc-acpi-scritps, and we don't find a proper solution that we can actually get through, I'm fine with waiting for (some) upstream to fix it - on my 901 I see 0.3W of difference, big but not unbearable. Cheers, Luca [1] Moreover, it doesn't fit in the way l-m-t works: autosuspend is something that one would want to keep always active, since there's not really a reason to turn it of on AC power. _______________________________________________ Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel
