-=| Luca Niccoli, Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:33:03AM +0100 |=- > 2009/11/3 Damyan Ivanov <[email protected]>: > > I agree with SynrG that eeepc-acpi-scripts shall be trimmed ofV > > anything that is not specific to the Eee (and even the Eee-specific > > stuff could find its place in other packages). Your patch seems like > > a step in the opposite direction. > > I agree. > Unfortunately, I don't think there's a chance to get a patch rejected > upstream in the debian kernel, or an additional rule in udev - the > places I think it belongs.
Place it in the wiki then? > If you think that it's not acceptable as a stop-gap solution in > eeepc-acpi-scritps, and we don't find a proper solution that we can > actually get through, I'm fine with waiting for (some) upstream to fix > it - on my 901 I see 0.3W of difference, big but not unbearable. You can always add the rule by hand. I think there was a suggestion about an usb module parameter that turns autosuspend to all usb devices. Not sure where I saw it. -- dam
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel
