# ipchains -A input -l -j ACCEPT
So it doesn't seem to be a terminal one.
Symptoms are the same if I flush all rules and specify policies to be ACCEPT.
# ipchains -F # ipchains -P input ACCEPT etc. (for all chains)
Pierre A.
From: Gian Piero Carrubba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: no ipchains with 2.2/no network with 2.4 Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:21:14 +0100
Il giorno dom, 09-01-2005 alle 18:09 +0100, Pierre A. Damas ha scritto:
> If I put all policies (input, output, forward) to ACCEPT and add only one
> accept rule with logging enabled, I see a lot of activity passing through
> ipchains, but not going anywhere though.
> (Ping hangs, frees or whatever, and produces 100% packet losts, on my
> internal and external/dmz network)
Well, last time i've used ipchains was far long away, so i'm not sure i can remember all the differences with iptables/netfilter. However, iirc, with ipchains the logging target was a "terminal" one. I mean, the packet was logged and then discarded, so a LOG target acted as a DENY one with addictional logging feature. If i'm right, I don't know how can you add an "accept rule with logging enabled".
Ciao, Gian Piero.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________ Try MSN Messenger 7.0 beta http://messenger.msn.be/beta
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
