In fact, the same network config is used without ipchains and with ipchains, so routing with that config worked with the kernel-image-2.2.20-idepci and doesn't work with kernel-image-2.2.20.
Pierre A.
p.s. when you suggest a modification, could you also explain what the expected effect would be ?
In that case, all the computers from my internal network have the gateway specification of 192.168.1.1, so I don't know what harm it could have to specify it also on the gateway itself.
If it was using DHCP (but with a reserved address), it would receive that same info also.
Thanks for your suggestions anyway, it allows me to have 15 minutes of hope while restarting the alternate kernel ;-)
From: Gian Piero Carrubba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: no ipchains with 2.2/no network with 2.4 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 01:05:24 +0100
Il giorno lun, 10-01-2005 alle 22:35 +0100, Pierre A. Damas ha scritto:
> The interface file contains: > > # /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for ifup(8), ifdown(8) [...] > auto eth1 > iface eth1 inet static > address 192.168.1.1 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > network 192.168.1.0 > broadcast 192.168.1.255 > gateway 192.168.1.1
Remove this last line ( gateway 192.168.1.1 ), so that `route -n` (after appropriate ifdown/ifup) should list:
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 192.168.254.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.254.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
without the following line:
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1
Ciao, Gian Piero.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________ Free e-mail? Try MSN Hotmail ! http://www.hotmail.com
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
