On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:07:08PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:49:51PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:56:01AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > > (3) make libnss-udeb which includes libnss-dns and libnss-files. > > > I think option (3) is probably the best. > > NACK, it will break our i386 floppies. > > > I don't mind whether you produce libnss-udeb or two separate > > libnss-*-udeb packages: although check that nothing depends on the > > existing libnss-dns-udeb (if so, a provides will be needed), and you'll > > probably break d-i daily builds for a couple of days if you drop > > libnss-dns-udeb now. > > > > If you go for (3) I think you should still do (1) as well: at least, > > that's the current arrangement with libnss_dns. > > Option 3 is not possible. Look at the free space on the i386 floppies.
Oh yes, that's indeed an issue ... those floppies are unbelievably tight on space but have to include libnss-dns-udeb. I've uploaded openssh udebs, which are in the NEW queue now. We'd really appreciate having a libnss-files-udeb and the augmented libc-udeb as soon as possible so that we can get on with integration work. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
