On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:49:51PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:56:01AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > (3) make libnss-udeb which includes libnss-dns and libnss-files. > > I think option (3) is probably the best.
NACK, it will break our i386 floppies.
> I don't mind whether you produce libnss-udeb or two separate
> libnss-*-udeb packages: although check that nothing depends on the
> existing libnss-dns-udeb (if so, a provides will be needed), and you'll
> probably break d-i daily builds for a couple of days if you drop
> libnss-dns-udeb now.
>
> If you go for (3) I think you should still do (1) as well: at least,
> that's the current arrangement with libnss_dns.
Option 3 is not possible. Look at the free space on the i386 floppies.
Bastian
--
Where there's no emotion, there's no motive for violence.
-- Spock, "Dagger of the Mind", stardate 2715.1
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
