On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote: > >> 4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.
> Thank you very much for clarification. Yes, I did it wrong, and now the > program does start, but the (4) above holds, right? Therefore I still > think it's a bug in ld-linux.so, even though not an important one for me > anymore. No, I don't think (4) holds. This is one of the most performance critical programs on a Linux system; it assumes that the input files are somewhat valid. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
