Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote: >> >> 4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what. > >> Thank you very much for clarification. Yes, I did it wrong, and now the >> program does start, but the (4) above holds, right? Therefore I still >> think it's a bug in ld-linux.so, even though not an important one for me >> anymore. > > No, I don't think (4) holds. This is one of the most performance > critical programs on a Linux system; it assumes that the input files > are somewhat valid.
Well, your answer suggests there are other programs that are allowed to segfault. Is there a list of them so that I won't repeat mistake reporting their segfaults as bugs in the future? ;) -- Sergei. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]