On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 2:32 AM Reinhard Tartler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 8:23 PM Shengjing Zhu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> golang-goprotobuf is special so let's start a new thread. > > > good call! > [...] > >> Now the question for Debian to move forward. >> 1. Should we bump golang-goprotobuf to v1.4+, this will break packages >> that still uses golang-gogoprotobuf, and unlikely will be fixed. >> 2. Should we stick golang-goprotobuf at v1.3, and only go with >> golang-google-protobuf package? >> This means we need to help upstream to finish the transition to >> protobuf v2 with golang-google-protobuf only. >> > > It seems that we currently have 243 packages declaring a "Build-Depends" > relationship in unstable on the old 1.3 golang-gogoprotobuf package, and > "only" 7 on the new golang-google-protobuf-dev. That's an awful lot of > breakage. > > Shengjing, would it be feasible to keep golang-gogoprotobuf at 1.3 and have > packages move over to google-protobuf-dev "peu-a-peu"?
Sorry, I don't get what it means. What is "peu-a-peu"? -- Shengjing Zhu
