On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 4:45 AM Shengjing Zhu <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think it again, maybe we should have both v1.3 and v1.4+
> golang-gogoprotobuf together,
> as we do the transition in C/C++ libraries. Some packages are difficult to
> be ported
> to new api, so we end up with two duplications in archive.
>
Sorry, it seems my rambling caused more confusion than the french bits.
To clarify, I do think we need to have some (code) duplication in the
archive, at least for a couple of months. I somehow assumed that we already
did have the v1.4+ (the google.golang.org/protobuf) code in a
separate source package, but apparently we have that only in experimental
for now?
--
regards,
Reinhard
