Hi, On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 8:37 PM Reinhard Tartler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 4:45 AM Shengjing Zhu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think it again, maybe we should have both v1.3 and v1.4+ >> golang-gogoprotobuf together, >> as we do the transition in C/C++ libraries. Some packages are difficult to >> be ported >> to new api, so we end up with two duplications in archive. > > > Sorry, it seems my rambling caused more confusion than the french bits. > > To clarify, I do think we need to have some (code) duplication in the > archive, at least for a couple of months. I somehow assumed that we already > did have the v1.4+ (the google.golang.org/protobuf) code in a separate source > package, but apparently we have that only in experimental for now?
google.golang.org/protobuf -> golang-google-protobuf-dev, 1.27.1 in unstable github.com/golang/protobuf -> golang-goprotobuf-dev, 1.3 in unstable, 1.4 in experimental github.com/gogo/protobuf -> golang-gogoprotobuf-dev, also 1.3 in unstable The names look similar to each other 🤦 -- Shengjing Zhu
