Hello all, On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:43:20AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > As I see it, there are two alternatives: > > 1) Keep both GNOME 1 and GNOME 2 for woody+1. All the GNOME 1 packages > keep their existing names (e.g. "nautilus", "galeon"). All the GNOME 2 > packages which have a namespace conflict with GNOME 1 have "2" appended. > > 2) Remove GNOME 1, and remove the "2" suffix from packages. > > Given how long woody+1 will likely take to release, I suggest we plan to > drop GNOME 1. We don't want to saddle GNOME upstream with having to > deal with supporting GNOME 1.4 that far in the future.
I would like to hear oppinions about this. And we should
make some plan. Would we like to have both, GNOME 1 and GNOME 2,
in the archives over a longer period of time?
At the moment I would favour possibility 2) from above.
Because the two versions of GNOME cannot be installed in parallel
it would be a hassle to maintain e.g. gnome-utils and gnome-utils2
at the same time.
What do you think?
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/privat.html
pgpAN1WYvvtAC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
