On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:14:31PM +0200, C�dric Delfosse wrote: > Le ven 12/09/2003 � 12:45, Sven Luther a �crit : > > > [...] > > > But you haven't covered the very serious issue here: sarge can't even ship > > > as is. Why the temptation to introduce even more problems (the possibility > > > of 2.4 piecemeal migrating) instead of ensuring a shippable sarge by > > > letting > > > 2.2 migrate down completely? > > > > As said in another mail. Why not upload the missing piece of 2.2 to > > testing-proposed-updates (provided they are not buggy per see, just hold > > up by glibc and co) and then go forward by uploading 2.4 to sid, and > > making sure the 2.4 will not enter sarge until we think it ready by > > filling bogus bug report or something such. > > > > I like this idea. But I don't know if the RM will accept it, because > there are lots of package to migrate.
He should be asked then, but i guess he would prefer that to not having a fallback solution in case we move to 2.4 in sid. Friendly, Sven Luther
