On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:10:01PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > NMU uploaded. Btw only a small part of gnome depends on gal2 and gnome > is not broken on all archs.
Thanks a lot for the quick NMU. I am not criticizing the gnome 2.4 effort at all. It's just that being unable to use nautilus (which despite being still there doesn't work well with a partial upgrade to g2.4) is what I call broken. But I upgraded lately to g2.4 I imagine mileage can be different. Christophe -- Christophe Barb� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about. -- John von Neumann
