christophe barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am not criticizing the gnome 2.4 effort at all. It's just that being > unable to use nautilus (which despite being still there doesn't work > well with a partial upgrade to g2.4) is what I call broken.
$ apt-cache showsrc nautilus | grep gal $ $ apt-cache show nautilus | grep gal $ Nautilus doesn't depends on gal2, and built fine on 9 archs ... so saying that gnome is broken on all archs is rude. Cheers, Sebastien Bacher
