On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:35:20PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > christophe barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I am not criticizing the gnome 2.4 effort at all. It's just that being > > unable to use nautilus (which despite being still there doesn't work > > well with a partial upgrade to g2.4) is what I call broken. > > $ apt-cache showsrc nautilus | grep gal > $ > > $ apt-cache show nautilus | grep gal > $ > > Nautilus doesn't depends on gal2, and built fine on 9 archs ... so > saying that gnome is broken on all archs is rude.
You seems to take it personnaly so I am sorry. I guess it's the word broken that you don't like. Nautilus is not the broken package anyway. It's the one I have on my system that is not playing nicely with the gnome libs I have. I can't install the current nautilus (which would work fine I am sure) without loosing a lot of gnome apps that I need. I believe the culprit was gal2 and thanks to you the situation should improve now. Question: is it possible to indicate to the buildd servers that they could retry to build some packages as soon as the new gal2 is available (gtkhml3, evolution, ...)? Christophe -- Christophe Barb� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E As every cat owner knows, nobody owns a cat. --Ellen Perry Berkeley
