On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:37:41AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:56:41AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > I have repeatedly warned libpng2/libpng10 users that these packages > >> > would have to be *removed* after the sarge release. Yes, removed. > >> > >> Well, you didn't warn me. You only warned primary users, not the > >> secondary users. The secondary users are all the ones whose packages > >> get uninstallable when libpng2/libpng10 goes away. > > > > Come on Thomas, we all knew about those problems since over a year > > ago, if not more, when the primarily mess about the libpng multiple > > incarnation hit the to-be stable of the time. So please stop > > exchanging blames and critics, and let's try to be positive and go > > forward with those problems. > > I knew about the multiple png problems. I didn't know the solution > chosen (drop png2) was going to be implemented without warning, nor > did I know that solution had been chosen.
Well, when we migrated away from the old one, it was common knoledge that we would remove the old ones in the long run. I think i heard about this two years ago first or something such. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
