Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 16.07.2014, 13:37 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> I don't know whether it is necessary for ghc-doc to conflict with > libghc-terminfo-doc and the others - it only conflicts if they are the > same version, and there's no good reason to build terminfo for the > same version as is built into ghc-doc. It is the general policy to have each package only once in Debian, so when when have terminfo in GHC, we won’t package it separately. Therefore it makes sense to remove a stale libghc-terminfo-doc package, as long as ghc-doc provides the documentation for it (I hope it does). The only exception currently is Cabal, which we need in a higher version for cabal-install’s sake. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
