Dear David, Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 21:37 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> I will try to look at this. But it looks like these libraries > *should* be included, so the fix is to add to the provides list: > > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8919 > http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/2af4jf/ghc783_is_out/ciufcfc I’m still not convinced, as I wrote in https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8919#comment:16 We need the .so files for the ghc and haddock binaries themselves, but I don’t think we necessarily have to include them as Haskell libraries, and continue to build and ship them as usual. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
