On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 06:03 -0700 schrieb David Fox: > > I believe that these packages should be in the Provides line for the > > ghc-doc package: > > > > > > libghc-binary-doc > > libghc-haskeline-doc > > libghc-terminfo-doc > > libghc-xhtml-doc > > > > > > ghc-doc contains a .haddock file for each of them. > > I wonder if we shouldn’t rather not ship these libraries with GHC, and > instead package them separately. That way, we can update them > independently. > Either way works for me, it is just that I'm getting build errors because our builder decides it needs to build those packages and then, because the cabal versions are the same, they collide with the .haddock files in ghc.
