On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:48:54PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote: > As usual, I expect there will be many ups and downs in the process. > So, we won't get as far as we would like. > > > jda, you mentioned that the libstdc++ testsuite could be examined in > > order to fix some of our failures. > > Yes, these need to be looked at before 3.4 is released. Some appear > to be related to long double support. Just guessing, but I think the > rest are locale or glibc related.
Does this seem like a reasonable triage list? a. gdb. b. atomic kernel ops. c. libstdc++ failures. c.
