> Does this seem like a reasonable triage list? > > a. gdb. > b. atomic kernel ops. > c. libstdc++ failures.
I expect GCC 3.4 is coming in 2-3 months, although there isn't a definite timeline yet. Would you like to try to get atomic kernel ops in 2.6.x? How important is the kernel timeline for this work? We missed gdb 6.0. A couple of quick hacks allow 6.0 to build for hppa-linux. Bug fixes are another matter. Probably, the v3 issues involve doing enough research to file a PR if the problem is generic, fix the problem if it is GCC hppa specific. If a problem turns out to be glibc/kernel related, we can wait for a fix ;) Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
