On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:16:44AM -0500, John David Anglin wrote: > > Does this seem like a reasonable triage list? > > > > a. gdb. > > b. atomic kernel ops. > > c. libstdc++ failures. > > I expect GCC 3.4 is coming in 2-3 months, although there isn't a definite > timeline yet. Would you like to try to get atomic kernel ops in 2.6.x? > How important is the kernel timeline for this work? We missed gdb 6.0. > A couple of quick hacks allow 6.0 to build for hppa-linux. Bug fixes are > another matter.
No timeline, just icing. > Probably, the v3 issues involve doing enough research to file a PR if > the problem is generic, fix the problem if it is GCC hppa specific. > If a problem turns out to be glibc/kernel related, we can wait for > a fix ;) I can interleave b,c in order to help you out? :) 80% gdb. 10% atomic ops. 10% libstc++ failures. c.
