On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:00:27AM -0700, Bill MacAllister wrote: > > > --On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:31:02 PM -0400 Carlos O'Donell > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi Alpha and HPPA porters, > >> > >>Thanks to the DSA team, we now have a new machine with plenty of > >>available space to run debian-ports.org. I have already started to copy > >>the data, and I hope to be able to do the final migration during the > >>next week-end (30th April / 1st May). I'll create the Alpha and HPPA > >>archive at the same time, so that we can start moving these > >>architectures during the week after. > > > >Thank you for helping out! > > > >In this post: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2011/05/msg00012.html, > >you write: "nobody answered my emails", but here you wrote "and got a > >few responses", could you please clarify? > > > >>In order to prepare this move, I would need a few informations: > >>- A place/way to fetch all the .deb that have to be import with the > >> corresponding .changes. > >>- List of persons who need to have access to the wanna-build interface. > >> If some of them are not DD, please also provide mail/login/ssh key. > >>- List of persons who should be able to upload packages to the archive > >> with the corresponding GPG keys (that should include buildds > >> maintainers). > >>- List of emails to be used as a contact point for alpha/hppa buildds > >> and alpha/hppa related things. > >>- List of buildds with their IP, SSH key and mail address. > > > >>I already asked all of that recently and got a few responses, but I > >>would prefer if one single person per architecture can work on that, and > >>send me a summary (preferably a signed mail from a Debian Developer). > >>It's easier than having to process individual requests. > > I had not noticed that this part of the request, i.e. that the response > be signed by a Debian Developer. I am not sure if this has happened for > alpha, but there are several of us that are working on getting a working > buildd environment. Aurelian, if you still need this please let us know > and we, us alpha types, will make it happen. >
I request that for two main reasons: - Given the amount of people complaining about the removal of these ports, I feared that a lot of people wanted to control the port, and that we end up in a situation were we have to handle conflicts. At the end it seems very few people are actually interesting to do the real work, so it's not really a problem anymore. - It ease to be Debian developer to get access to all the previous data about the port (mainly changes files), but at the end, given I did this work, this point doesn't make sense anymore. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
