On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:33:23AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > On 7/6/2011 4:24 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:12 AM, dann frazier<[email protected]> wrote: > >>Right - we have machines we should be able to use (peri/penalosa) - > >>they currently only build lenny updates today. And yeah, not having a > >>stable release will make managing these systems a bigger timesink, and > >>I won't be able to volunteer for that. > >> > >>DSA manages these machines for us, and it probably isn't feasible to > >>give non-DDs access to boxes building security updates. So, we'll > >>likely need to repurpose one of these machines and manage it under > >>debian-ports. That leaves us w/o a backup for lenny updates, but I can > >>setup a system here at home in a pinch. Once lenny support ends, both > >>machines could be allocated for debian-ports. > >[trimming CC list] > > > >Dan, > > > >So it looks like we have one machine that we could setup as a > >unstable/experimental buildd? > > > There is also a machine (rp3440) in the ESIEE test ring that might > make a good buildd machine > if security isn't too big an issue.
I'd definitely recommend multiple systems. There's a lot of building to do.. > >How do we get started on that and how can I help? > > > Same here. Thanks Carlos. > > Dave > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
