On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:08 PM, dann frazier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:33:23AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: >> On 7/6/2011 4:24 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> >On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:12 AM, dann frazier<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>Right - we have machines we should be able to use (peri/penalosa) - >> >>they currently only build lenny updates today. And yeah, not having a >> >>stable release will make managing these systems a bigger timesink, and >> >>I won't be able to volunteer for that. >> >> >> >>DSA manages these machines for us, and it probably isn't feasible to >> >>give non-DDs access to boxes building security updates. So, we'll >> >>likely need to repurpose one of these machines and manage it under >> >>debian-ports. That leaves us w/o a backup for lenny updates, but I can >> >>setup a system here at home in a pinch. Once lenny support ends, both >> >>machines could be allocated for debian-ports. >> >[trimming CC list] >> > >> >Dan, >> > >> >So it looks like we have one machine that we could setup as a >> >unstable/experimental buildd? >> > >> There is also a machine (rp3440) in the ESIEE test ring that might >> make a good buildd machine >> if security isn't too big an issue. > > I'd definitely recommend multiple systems. There's a lot of building > to do..
So in summary we are going to have penalosa and ESIEE's rp3440 doing builds for debian-ports? I have asked Aurelien what is required for debian-ports on these machines. I'll wait to see what he says. Cheers, Carlos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadzpyiyd5xwmid4evkzfembetqjtcafax71ilezfne3hxzh...@mail.gmail.com
