Hi,
this patch attached takes care of the shared libraies in /usr/lib and makes
sure you get a dependency on thoe. It's a rude hack, and you will get one
warning for every library. For libraries in /lib, you get a warning that it
can't find them in /usr/lib. For libs in /usr/lib, you get warnings that it
can't find them in /lib. That's okay, the dependencies will be ok, because
it checks both, lib and usr/lib (one always works, one always fails).
I think you will also get warnings that it can't find the X libs in
/X11R6/lib or /usr/usr/X11R6/lib, depending on how you define
LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
In any way, please add this patch. missing dependencies can be annoying.
It can also happen that you get a broken Depends: line otherwise. So just
add this for now.
I will give a notice when dpkg-dev has a dpkg-shlibdeps which works better.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
--- /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps.orig Sat Jan 13 15:01:31 2001
+++ /gnu/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps Sun Mar 4 15:07:29 2001
@@ -114,15 +114,19 @@
chomp;
if (m,^\s*NEEDED\s+,) {
if (m,^\s*NEEDED\s+((\S+)\.so\.(\S+))$,) {
- push(@libname,$2); push(@libsoname,$3);
- push(@libf,$execf[$i]);
+ push(@libname,$2); push(@libname,$2);
+ push(@libsoname,$3); push(@libsoname,$3);
+ push(@libf,$execf[$i]); push(@libf,$execf[$i]);
&warn("could not find path for $1") unless
defined($so2path{$1});
push(@libfiles,$so2path{$1});
+ push(@libfiles, "/usr" . $so2path{$1});
} elsif (m,^\s*NEEDED\s+((\S+)-(\S+)\.so)$,) {
- push(@libname,$2); push(@libsoname,$3);
- push(@libf,$execf[$i]);
+ push(@libname,$2); push(@libname,$2);
+ push(@libsoname,$3); push(@libsoname,$3);
+ push(@libf,$execf[$i]); push(@libf,$execf[$i]);
&warn("could not find path for $1") unless
defined($so2path{$1});
push(@libfiles,$so2path{$1});
+ push(@libfiles,"/usr" . $so2path{$1});
} else {
m,^\s*NEEDED\s+(\S+)$,;
&warn("format of $1 not recognized");
