On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 09:27:52AM +0200, Neal H Walfield wrote: > > Well, if RMS prefers "Debian GNU/Hurd", then I have no objection to > > the name. > > I am fine with this, however, I would also like a bit of clarification > on one other permutations. Specifically, is it "GNU Hurd," "the GNU > Hurd," "GNU/Hurd" or "the GNU/Hurd"? The second is used in the README > file. The third, however, seems to be current usage.
I prefer GNU/Hurd for consistancy with GNU/Linux. -- Abandon the search for truth; settle for a good fantasy.
