On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Clytie Siddall wrote: > > On 14/06/2005, at 8:17 PM, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: > > [re gettext] > > > I knew it a bit too well for a while. It is far from > > perfect, but having comments as a part of the message-ids is > > an excellent way of making otherwise implicit grammatical > > information explicit. > > Exactly: I'm a bit puzzled by _suggestions_ to implement developer or > translator comments: those facilities are a basic element of all > gettext .po files. > > In the case of the translator, all you need to do to this string: [rather obvious]
The problem is developer comments, not translator comments. When a string has a special context (or maximum length), there should be an automatic comment in the pot file. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
