Remco van de Meent wrote:
That's not completly true. In my opinion will simply make the transitionWichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Remco van de Meent wrote:
Why create yet another chicken/egg problem? Introducing new delay now causes even worse problems in the future.
Do a lookup in both now..
Helps the user at this moment, but doesn't lead to the necessary momentum necessary for a change from ip6.int to ip6.arpa.
a bit smoother. Like it is now I can't even think to use netstat because
it becomes unreadable. And as I wrote before the code is broken in general.
I have my dns with ip6.arpa support enabled but I cant even resolv my local
ip's. BTW my intention was not to generate problems but to help people like me
until a better code will not come out from the upstream.
Thanks Fabio
