In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 4 Feb 2002 01:30:20 +0100), "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> On Feb 03, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Should we support temporary ip6.int and ip6.arpa (that anyway is NOT working > >in the libc6 code) or should we just leave the code that comes from the > >upstream (ip6.arpa)????? > If a choice has to be made, the I'd say we MUST choose ip6.int for woody. query ip6.arpa, then ip6.int.; both using nibble format. we may need "no-ip6-arpa" resolver option. --yoshfuji
