On Feb 03, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Should we support temporary ip6.int and ip6.arpa (that anyway is NOT working >in the libc6 code) or should we just leave the code that comes from the >upstream (ip6.arpa)????? If a choice has to be made, the I'd say we MUST choose ip6.int for woody.
-- ciao, Marco
