Hello > I see. So tuxpaint has use::learning, clarified by > works-with::image:raster. But if we looked for use::editing and > works-with::image:raster, we'd see gimp and krita, but miss tuxpaint. > I'm not sure this is right. From a child's perspective the "use" of > tuxpaint is to edit raster images. The fact that they're learning in > the process is something they're barely conscious of. Is there anything speaking against adding use::editing too? That's why we have the debtags system - to be able to apply multiple categories.
Best regards Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
