-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 09:35:56AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> What architecture line are we talking about here? Is there a >> bug report number I can refer to to refresh my memory on this issue? > > ... > >> Again, what is broken about EXTRAVERSION? Which bug reports >> are we talking about? > > ... > >> I'd be happy to look at why bits of the build process take >> longer than a raw build without make-kpkg -- which bug number was >> this reported under? > > Manoj, you see, this is part of the problem. Nearer integration of the > kernel-package maintainer and kernel team, or you being part of the kernel > team, doesn't necessarily mean communicating via bug reports.
What's wrong with filing bugreports? You seem to argue that keeping record of bugs is wrong is replaceable with coordination on a mailinglist, spiced up with IRC conversations. I disagree. Teaming up is great, but does not replace the core routines in Debian. It just glues them better together. IMHO. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFiXJgn7DbMsAkQLgRAukGAJ9WyRa3Y9KFuGsztQbyZieqGSyxXgCfVVRA MgDj3Vbrv8sp6Kg2RBXyjrM= =9wGi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
