On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 09:17:06AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 01:32:20PM +0000, Brett Parker wrote: > > Looks reasonable to me, the only thing that caught my eye was that > > there's no choice of venue for legal action > > Choice of venue is widely (not quite unanimously) considered non-free, > so I'm curious: why are you suggesting that *lack* of choice of venue > is a problem?
Ah, maybe I misunderstood that then ;) > > and that legal action can > > not occur until 1 year after the piece of code has entered the program > > "No Recipient will bring a legal action under this License more than one year > after the cause of action arose." That says that legal action must happen > within one year of infringement, not that it must wait for one year. I > don't know if that's free or not; I also have no idea if it's enforcable. OK - maybe I read that bit wrong then, it was a rather quick read through. I'm not sure that that's enforcable, but it seems an odd thing for a licence to hold. Sorry for my mis-reading of that. Thanks for putting me on the straight and narrow. -- Brett Parker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
