On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:53:34AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (Mostly cut, because this is the fundamental argument:) > > > Yeesh, this is like the documentation thing all over again. Are we > > going to have to go through the litany of months of fruitless debates > > on the issue just to establish that special pleading doesn't apply to > > images either? > > What freedom are you trying to protect by claiming that JPEGs are not > adequately modifiable? Do you wish to apply this argument to all JPEGs?
The freedom to modify the images to suit my purposes, of course. See http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/free-sw.html This whole affair is remarkably disingenuous. These are the most fundamental points, and they apply to everything. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
