On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:47:56PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > Personally, I don't think it's a particularly compelling example because > it's a way of extracting documentation from a program and we're trying > to describe the opposite direction. But I guess I don't really object > to it either.
It's an example of how no consistent distinction between documentation and programs can be drawn: the source *is* the documentation. I think it's a clear demonstration of how it's impossible to meaningfully hold programs and documentation to different standards of freedom. -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
