On 5/9/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I discuss below, there are considerable grounds for believing that the > category "derivative works" is completely disjoint from "collective > works".
In other words, you can't have a work where both categories apply. On 5/10/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A translation of an arrangement of two works, selected by a > non-trivial criterion, is ... wait for it ... a derivative work _of_ a > collection! "of" \neq "and". In other words, these two categories are not disjoint. Contradiction. -- Raul
