On 5/19/05, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And once again, you're the only one who thinks we're doing this. The rest of > us, as far as I can tell, think that giving a user a script that makes it > easier to compile a certain binary does not equate to distribution of the > same binary.
The only one posting that, sure. > If it was, then the upstream would be as guilty as we are, since he > presumably includes a configre script with --with-ssl as one of its options. You are correct: we would not be the only guilty ones. To my knowledge, we do a pretty good job of dealing with these issues. -- Raul
