On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:38:18PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > On 5/19/05, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My argument is that infringment has to actually take place in order for > > > there to be contributory infringement. If this is not the case, please > > > explain how there can be contributory infringement without any actual > > > infringement taking place. > > Which can occur if anyone redistributes any of the I_WANT_OPENSSL > debian packages.
According to you. If, for the sake of argument, we assume that such binaries are undistributable, Debian is still not affected, since we aren't contributing to their distribution, only their creation. --Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
